0

Alcaftadine 0.25% Versus Olopatadine 0.1% in Preventing Cedar Pollen Allergic Conjunctivitis in Japan: A Randomized Study

Hiroshi Nakatani, Paul Gomes, Ron Bradford, Qiang Guo, Eleonora Safyan, David A Hollander

Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2019;27(4):622-631.

PMID: 29543548

Abstract:

Purpose: To compare alcaftadine and olopatadine ophthalmic solutions, and vehicle for preventing allergen-mediated conjunctivitis in Japanese subjects. Methods: Japanese cedar pollen-sensitive subjects were randomized to alcaftadine 0.25%, olopatadine 0.1%, or vehicle. Ocular itching was assessed at 3, 5 (primary outcome), 7, and 15 min post-conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) and conjunctival hyperemia assessed at 7, 15 (secondary outcome), and 20 min post-CAC. Adverse events were monitored. Results: Overall, 240 subjects were randomized. Alcaftadine 0.25% (challenged 8 h post-dose) was significantly more effective than vehicle for prevention of itching and conjunctival hyperemia (p < 0.001) and noninferior to olopatadine 0.1% (challenged 4 h post-dose). Significantly lower hyperemia scores were observed in alcaftadine-treated than olopatadine-treated eyes at 7 and 15 min post-CAC (p ≤ 0.027). Alcaftadine and olopatadine were well tolerated; no serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Alcaftadine 0.25% is effective in preventing signs and symptoms of Japanese cedar pollen-induced allergic conjunctivitis.

Chemicals Related in the Paper:

Catalog Number Product Name Structure CAS Number Price
AP147084104 Alcaftadine Alcaftadine 147084-10-4 Price
qrcode