Home
Resources
Publications
Comparison of Self-Gated and Prospectively Triggered Fast Low Angle Shot (FLASH) Sequences for Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Liver at 9.4 T in a Rat Model of Colorectal Cancer Metastases

Comparison of Self-Gated and Prospectively Triggered Fast Low Angle Shot (FLASH) Sequences for Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Liver at 9.4 T in a Rat Model of Colorectal Cancer Metastases

Peter Fries, Roland Seidel, Andreas Müller, Kathrin Matthes, Gero Denda, Alexander Massmann, Michael D Menger, Jens Sperling, John N Morelli, Katrin Altmeyer, Günther Schneider, Arno Buecker

Invest Radiol. 2013 Oct;48(10):738-44.

PMID: 23695083

Abstract:

Objective:
The aim of this study was to compare a retrospectively self-gated fast low angle shot sequence (RSG-FLASH) with a prospectively triggered fast low angle shot sequence (PT-FLASH) using an external trigger device for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver at 9.4 T in a rat model of colorectal cancer metastases.
Materials and methods:
In 10 rats with hepatic metastases, we acquired an axial RSG-FLASH sequence through the liver. A FLASH sequence with prospective triggering (PT-FLASH) using an external trigger device was acquired at the same location with the same imaging parameters. After intravenous injection of 0.2 mmol/kg body weight of Gd-DTPA, alternating acquisitions of both sequences were performed at 4 consecutive time points.Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and lesion enhancement were obtained for liver tumors and parenchyma. In addition, we assessed the total acquisition times of the different imaging approaches for each acquisition, including triggering and gating. Two independent readers performed a qualitative evaluation of each sequence. Statistical analyses included paired t tests and Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank tests.
Results:
No statistically significant differences in SNR, CNR, or lesion enhancement were observed. Qualitative assessments of the sequences were comparable. However, acquisition times of PT-FLASH were significantly longer (mean [SD], 160.6 [25.7] seconds; P < 0.0001) and markedly variable (minimum, 120 seconds; maximum, 209 seconds), whereas the RSG-FLASH approach demonstrated a constant mean (SD) acquisition time of 59.0 (0) seconds.
Conclusions:
The RSG-FLASH and PT-FLASH sequences do not differ qualitatively or quantitatively regarding SNR, CNR, and lesion enhancement for magnetic resonance imaging of the liver in the rats at 9.4 T. However, the variability of acquisition times for the PT-FLASH sequences is a major factor of inconsistency, and we therefore consider this approach as inappropriate for dynamic contrast-enhanced studies with multiple-measurement time points. In contrast, the RSG-FLASH sequence represents a fast, consistent, and reproducible technique suitable for contrast-agent kinetic studies in experimental small-animal imaging of the abdomen.

Chemicals Related in the Paper:

Catalog Number	Product Name	Structure	CAS Number	Price
IAR42152	Flash Point - PT			Price

As a specialist in analytical chemical Products, Alfa Chemistry offers consumers a wealth of raw materials and a full range of technologies and services.

QUICK LINKS

HEADQUARTERS

Tel:

Fax:

Email: