0

Effect of Glyburide vs Subcutaneous Insulin on Perinatal Complications Among Women With Gestational Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Marie-Victoire Sénat, Helene Affres, Alexandra Letourneau, Magali Coustols-Valat, Marie Cazaubiel, Helene Legardeur, Julie Fort Jacquier, Nathalie Bourcigaux, Emmanuel Simon, Anne Rod, Isabelle Héron, Virginie Castera, etc.

JAMA. 2018 May 1;319(17):1773-1780.

PMID: 29715355

Abstract:

Importance:
Randomized trials have not focused on neonatal complications of glyburide for women with gestational diabetes.
Objective:
To compare oral glyburide vs subcutaneous insulin in prevention of perinatal complications in newborns of women with gestational diabetes.
Design, settings, and participants:
The Insulin Daonil trial (INDAO), a multicenter noninferiority randomized trial conducted between May 2012 and November 2016 (end of participant follow-up) in 13 tertiary care university hospitals in France including 914 women with singleton pregnancies and gestational diabetes diagnosed between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation.
Interventions:
Women who required pharmacologic treatment after 10 days of dietary intervention were randomly assigned to receive glyburide (n=460) or insulin (n=454). The starting dosage for glyburide was 2.5 mg orally once per day and could be increased if necessary 4 days later by 2.5 mg and thereafter by 5 mg every 4 days in 2 morning and evening doses, up to a maximum of 20 mg/d. The starting dosage for insulin was 4 IU to 20 IU given subcutaneously 1 to 4 times per day as necessary and increased according to self-measured blood glucose concentrations.
Main outcomes and measures:
The primary outcome was a composite criterion including macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, and hyperbilirubinemia. The noninferiority margin was set at 7% based on a 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval.
Results:
Among the 914 patients who were randomized (mean age, 32.8 [SD, 5.2] years), 98% completed the trial. In a per-protocol analysis, 367 and 442 women and their neonates were analyzed in the glyburide and insulin groups, respectively. The frequency of the primary outcome was 27.6% in the glyburide group and 23.4% in the insulin group, a difference of 4.2% (1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 10.5%; P=.19).
Conclusion and relevance:
This study of women with gestational diabetes failed to show that use of glyburide compared with subcutaneous insulin does not result in a greater frequency of perinatal complications. These findings do not justify the use of glyburide as a first-line treatment.
Trial registration:
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01731431.

Chemicals Related in the Paper:

Catalog Number Product Name Structure CAS Number Price
AP10238218-A Glyburide Glyburide 10238-21-8 Price
qrcode