0

Luteolytic Effects of Cloprostenol Sodium in Lactating Dairy Cows Treated With G6G/Ovsynch

J P N Martins, R K Policelli, J R Pursley

J Dairy Sci. 2011 Jun;94(6):2806-14.

PMID: 21605750

Abstract:

The probability of a pregnancy decreases substantially in lactating dairy cows treated with Ovsynch if luteolysis is delayed or incomplete. Two PGF(2α) products are currently approved in the United States for luteolysis in lactating dairy cattle, dinoprost tromethamine and cloprostenol sodium. Cloprostenol has a longer half-life compared with dinoprost, is more resistant to endogenous metabolism, and is maintained in circulation longer. We hypothesized that cloprostenol could reduce the time to complete luteolysis compared with dinoprost because of differences in half-life. Lactating dairy cows received the same presynchronization strategy (G6G; 25mg of PGF(2α) - 2 d - 100 μg of GnRH - 6 d - 100 μg of GnRH - 7 d - final PGF(2α) treatment). At the time of the final PGF(2α), cows (n=35) were randomly assigned to receive either 500μg of cloprostenol or 25mg of dinoprost. Blood samples were collected daily before and serially after PGF(2α) treatment to analyze circulating concentrations of progesterone (P(4)) and estradiol (E(2)). Ultrasound examinations of ovaries were performed to measure sizes of follicles and corpora lutea (CL) and determine time of ovulation. Considering only cows with complete luteolysis, mean circulating P(4) was lower for cows given cloprostenol than for those given dinoprost between 0 and 12h postinjection, but not at 24, 36, or 48 h. A rapid decrease in P(4) was observed 1h after PGF(2α) (6.54 ± 0.27 to 3.77 ± 0.22 ng/mL) followed by a complete rebound 1h later (3.77 ± 0.22 to 5.07 ± 0.31 ng/mL) followed by a steady decline in both treatment groups. Serum concentrations of E(2) were greater at 48 h posttreatment in cloprostenol-treated cows (2.74 ± 0.15 pg/mL) than in dinoprost-treated cows (2.37 ± 0.19 pg/mL). Cows that did not have complete luteolysis did not ovulate (0/7) during the 6-d period following treatment. Time to complete luteolysis and ovulation was 29.1 ± 1.1 versus 29.4 ± 1.7 and 101 versus 103 h posttreatment in cloprostenol compared with dinoprost. A negative relationship was observed between P(4) at 12h posttreatment and concentrations of E(2) 48 h posttreatment (b=-0.6905; R(2)=0.23). In summary, cows treated with cloprostenol had lower concentrations of P(4) for the first 12h following treatment and subsequently greater concentrations of E(2) compared with dinoprost, although no differences were observed in these 2 PGF(2α) analogs for time to complete luteolysis or time to ovulation.

Chemicals Related in the Paper:

Catalog Number Product Name Structure CAS Number Price
ALP55028723-A Cloprostenol sodium Cloprostenol sodium 55028-72-3 (anhydrous) Price
qrcode